SO ————
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7071S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR4819-13
22 Nov 13
This is in reference to your appli
naval record pursuant to the provi
cation for correction of your
sions of 10 USC 1552.
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your’ naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 29 Aug
13, a copy of which is attached.
ntious consideration of the entire
hat the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
After careful and conscie
record, the Board found t
The Board members also considered your request for a personal
however, they found that the issues in the case were
ted and that a personal appearance would not
materially add to the Board's understanding of the issues
involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been
denied.
appearance;
Docket No. NR4819-13
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
gonsequently, when applying for a e@rrection of an official
maval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable;material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ld Dea
W. DEAN PF
Executive Director
Enclosure: HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 29 Aug 13
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10844 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 14 Jan 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10397 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10119 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, : regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 13 Feb 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10676 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR dtc 14 Jan 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5037 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2197-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your: application on 11 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0629-13
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 24 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0701-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1101-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2239-13
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 21 May 13, a copy of which is attached. ...